Sensitivity of predictions in an effective model -- application to the chiral critical end point position in the Nambu--Jona-Lasinio model
Alexandre Biguet, Hubert Hansen, Pedro Costa, Pierre Borgnat,, Timoth\'ee Brugi\`ere

TL;DR
This paper investigates the sensitivity of the predicted chiral critical end point in the QCD phase diagram using an effective Nambu--Jona-Lasinio model, revealing that the prediction is highly sensitive to input variations, especially for the temperature coordinate.
Contribution
It introduces an inverse problem framework to evaluate the stability of CEP predictions in effective models, highlighting the ill-conditioning of the temperature coordinate prediction.
Findings
CEP position is ill-conditioned with respect to temperature variations.
CEP position is well-conditioned with respect to chemical potential variations.
Small input changes can determine the existence of the CEP.
Abstract
The measurement of the position of the chiral critical end point (CEP) in the QCD phase diagram is under debate. While it is possible to predict its position by using effective models specifically built to reproduce some of the features of the underlying theory (QCD), the quality of the predictions (\textit{e.g.}, the CEP position) obtained by such effective models, depends on whether solving the model equations constitute a well- or ill-posed inverse problem. Considering these predictions as being inverse problems provides tools to evaluate if the problem is ill-conditioned, meaning that infinitesimal variations of the inputs of the model can cause comparatively large variations of the predictions. If it is ill-conditioned, it has major consequences because of finite variations that could come from experimental and/or theoretical errors. In the following, we shall apply such a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
