
TL;DR
This paper develops a complete logical framework for reasoning about advanced functional dependencies that incorporate similarity and ordering, extending traditional FDs with richer semantic expressiveness.
Contribution
It introduces a novel logic for functional dependencies based on ordered monoids and residuated lattices, providing a complete axiomatization and exploring semantic and computational aspects.
Findings
Complete axiomatization of the logic using Armstrong-like rules
Expressiveness of dependencies for similarity and ordering
Discussion of computational and semantic considerations
Abstract
We present a complete logic for reasoning with functional dependencies (FDs) with semantics defined over classes of commutative integral partially ordered monoids and complete residuated lattices. The dependencies allow us to express stronger relationships between attribute values than the ordinary FDs. In our setting, the dependencies not only express that certain values are determined by others but also express that similar values of attributes imply similar values of other attributes. We show complete axiomatization using a system of Armstrong-like rules, comment on related computational issues, and the relational vs. propositional semantics of the dependencies.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
