The Fortuitous Latitude of the Pierre Auger Observatory and Telescope Array for Reconstructing the Quadrupole Moment
Peter B. Denton, Thomas J. Weiler

TL;DR
This paper identifies an optimal latitude for cosmic ray observatories to accurately reconstruct the quadrupole moment of anisotropies, highlighting that existing major observatories are located near this optimal latitude, enabling precise measurements.
Contribution
The study derives the optimal latitude for cosmic ray experiments to measure the quadrupole moment, explaining why current major observatories are ideally positioned for this task.
Findings
Optimal latitude minimizes exposure-related errors in quadrupole reconstruction.
Pierre Auger Observatory and Telescope Array are located near this optimal latitude.
High-precision quadrupole measurements are feasible at these observatories.
Abstract
Determining anisotropies in the arrival directions of cosmic rays at the highest energy is an important task in astrophysics. It is common and useful to partition the sky into spherical harmonics as a measure of anisotropy. The two lowest nontrivial spherical harmonics, the dipole and the quadrupole, are of particular interest, since these distributions encapsulate a dominant single source and a plane of sources, as well as offering relatively high statistics. The best experiments for the detection of ultra high energy cosmic rays currently are all ground-based, with highly nonuniform exposures on the sky resulting from the fixed experimental locations on the earth. This nonuniform exposure increases the complexity and error in inferring anisotropies. It turns out that there is an optimal latitude for an experiment at which nonuniform exposure does not diminish the inference of the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
