Time sequence spectroscopy of AW UMa. The 518 nm Mg I triplet region analyzed with Broadening Functions

TL;DR

This study uses high-resolution spectroscopy and Broadening Functions to analyze AW UMa, revealing complex mass motions, inhomogeneities, and a smaller secondary than predicted, challenging the contact binary model.

Contribution

It provides detailed spectroscopic analysis of AW UMa, showing vigorous mass motions and discrepancies with the contact binary model, highlighting the need for high-quality spectroscopy.

Findings

Detection of vigorous mass motions within AW UMa.

Presence of inhomogeneities and a broadening pedestal in the primary.

The secondary is smaller than predicted by contact models.

Abstract

High resolution spectroscopic observations of AW UMa, obtained on three consecutive nights with the median time resolution of 2.1 minutes, have been analyzed using the Broadening Functions method in the spectral window Doppler images of the system reveal the presence of vigorous mass motions within the binary system; their presence puts into question the solid-body rotation assumption of the contact binary model. AW UMa appears to be a very tight, semi-detached binary; the mass transfer takes place from the more massive to the less massive component. The primary, a fast-rotating star with V sin i = 181.4+\-2.5 km s^-1, is covered by inhomogeneities: very slowly drifting spots and a dense network of ripples more closely participating in its rotation. The spectral lines of the primary show an additional broadening component (called the "pedestal") which originates either in the equatorial regions which rotate faster than the rest of the star by about 50 km s^-1 or in an external disk-like structure. The secondary component appears to be smaller than predicted by the contact model. The radial velocity field around the secondary is dominated by accretion of matter transferred from (and possibly partly returned to) the primary component. The parameters of the binary are: A sin i = 2.73 +/- 0.11 R_odot and M_1 sin^3 i = 1.29 +/- 0.15 M_odot, M_2 sin^3 i = 0.128 +/- 0.016 M_odot. The mass ratio q_rm sp = M_2/M_1 = 0.099 +/- 0.003, while still the most uncertain among the spectroscopic elements, is substantially different from the previous numerous and mutually consistent photometric investigations which were based on the contact model. It should be studied why photometry and spectroscopy give so very discrepant results and whether AW UMa is an unusual object or that only very high-quality spectroscopy can reveal the true nature of W UMa-type binaries.