Gaia-ESO Survey: The analysis of high-resolution UVES spectra of FGK-type stars
R. Smiljanic, A. J. Korn, M. Bergemann, A. Frasca, L. Magrini, T., Masseron, E. Pancino, G. Ruchti, I. San Roman, L. Sbordone, S. G. Sousa, H., Tabernero, G. Tautvaisiene, M. Valentini, M. Weber, C. C. Worley, V. Zh., Adibekyan, C. Allende Prieto, G. Barisevicius, K. Biazzo

TL;DR
This paper details the analysis of high-resolution UVES spectra for 1301 FGK-type stars in the Gaia-ESO Survey, establishing a robust parameter scale and providing detailed chemical abundances with quantified precision and biases.
Contribution
It introduces a comprehensive methodology for analyzing UVES spectra, defining a final recommended parameter scale, and assessing the accuracy and precision of stellar parameters and abundances.
Findings
Atmospheric parameters for 1301 stars were determined with median method-to-method dispersions of 55 K, 0.13 dex, and 0.07 dex.
Systematic biases in parameters are estimated to be 50-100 K for Teff, 0.10-0.25 dex for log g, and 0.05-0.10 dex for [Fe/H].
Abundances for 24 elements were derived with typical dispersions between 0.10 and 0.20 dex.
Abstract
The Gaia-ESO Survey is obtaining high-quality spectroscopic data for about 10^5 stars using FLAMES at the VLT. UVES high-resolution spectra are being collected for about 5000 FGK-type stars. These UVES spectra are analyzed in parallel by several state-of-the-art methodologies. Our aim is to present how these analyses were implemented, to discuss their results, and to describe how a final recommended parameter scale is defined. We also discuss the precision (method-to-method dispersion) and accuracy (biases with respect to the reference values) of the final parameters. These results are part of the Gaia-ESO 2nd internal release and will be part of its 1st public release of advanced data products. The final parameter scale is tied to the one defined by the Gaia benchmark stars, a set of stars with fundamental atmospheric parameters. A set of open and globular clusters is used to evaluate…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
