Supporting acceptance testing in distributed software projects with integrated feedback systems: Experiences and requirements
Olga Liskin, Christoph Herrmann, Eric Knauss, Thomas Kurpick, Bernhard, Rumpe, Kurt Schneider

TL;DR
This paper explores how integrated feedback systems can improve acceptance testing in distributed software projects by capturing findings effectively, reducing misunderstandings, and enhancing communication between customers and developers.
Contribution
It provides empirical insights into the benefits and requirements of using feedback systems for acceptance testing in distributed teams.
Findings
Feedback systems can improve acceptance testing effectiveness.
Certain key requirements are necessary for feedback systems to be beneficial.
Using feedback systems reduces customer effort and misunderstandings.
Abstract
During acceptance testing customers assess whether a system meets their expectations and often identify issues that should be improved. These findings have to be communicated to the developers a task we observed to be error prone, especially in distributed teams. Here, it is normally not possible to have developer representatives from every site attend the test. Developers who were not present might misunderstand insufficiently documented findings. This hinders fixing the issues and endangers customer satisfaction. Integrated feedback systems promise to mitigate this problem. They allow to easily capture findings and their context. Correctly applied, this technique could improve feedback, while reducing customer effort. This paper collects our experiences from comparing acceptance testing with and without feedback systems in a distributed project. Our results indicate that this…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
