Strain driven anisotropic magnetoresistance in antiferromagnetic La$_{0.4}$Sr$_{0.6}$MnO$_{3}$
A.T. Wong, C. Beekman, H. Guo, W. Siemons, Z. Gai, E. Arenholz, Y., Takamura, and T.Z. Ward

TL;DR
This study explores how strain influences anisotropic magnetoresistance in antiferromagnetic La$_{0.4}$Sr$_{0.6}$MnO$_{3}$ thin films, revealing strain-dependent AMR behaviors and magnetic ordering without ferromagnetic transition.
Contribution
It demonstrates strain-induced variations in AMR and magnetic ordering in AFM La$_{0.4}$Sr$_{0.6}$MnO$_{3}$ thin films, including a previously unreported AMR behavior under tensile strain.
Findings
Compressive strain enhances AMR up to 63%.
Tensile strain induces a metal-insulator transition.
No global ferromagnetic phase transition observed.
Abstract
We investigate the effects of strain on antiferromagntic (AFM) single crystal thin films of LaSrMnO (x = 0.6). Nominally unstrained samples have strong magnetoresistance with anisotropic magnetoresistances (AMR) of up to 8%. Compressive strain suppresses magnetoresistance but generates AMR values of up to 63%. Tensile strain presents the only case of a metal-insulator transition and demonstrates a previously unreported AMR behavior. In all three cases, we find evidence of magnetic ordering and no indication of a global ferromagnetic phase transition. These behaviors are attributed to epitaxy induced changes in orbital occupation driving different magnetic ordering types. Our findings suggest that different AFM ordering types have a profound impact on the AMR magnitude and character.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
