Accounting for the 'network' in the Natura 2000 network: A response to Hochkirch et al. 2013

TL;DR

This paper emphasizes the importance of considering the network structure of Natura 2000 sites to improve biodiversity conservation efforts in Europe, addressing shortcomings in previous implementation strategies.

Contribution

It introduces the necessity of accounting for the network character of Natura 2000 sites to enhance conservation effectiveness and policy planning.

Findings

Network-aware conservation planning improves biodiversity outcomes.

Ignoring network structure undermines Natura 2000's effectiveness.

Addressing network aspects is crucial for successful Natura 2000 implementation.

Abstract

Worldwide, we are experiencing an unprecedented, accelerated loss of biodiversity triggered by a bundle of anthropogenic threats such as habitat destruction, environmental pollution and climate change. Despite all efforts of the European biodiversity conservation policy, initiated 20 years ago by the Habitats Directive that provided the legal basis for establishing the Natura 2000 network, the goal to halt the decline of biodiversity in Europe by 2010 has been missed. Hochkirch et al. (2013, Conserv. Lett. 6: 462-467) identified four major shortcomings of the current implementation of the directive concerning prioritization of the annexes, conservation plans, survey systems and financial resources. However they did not account for the intended network character of the Natura 2000 sites, an aspect of highest relevance. This response letter deals with this shortcoming as it is the prerequisite, over any other strategies, ensuring a Natura 2020 network being worth its name.