Mitigation of infectious disease at school: targeted class closure vs school closure
Valerio Gemmetto, Alain Barrat, Ciro Cattuto

TL;DR
This study demonstrates that targeted class closures based on symptomatic cases can significantly reduce influenza spread in schools, offering an effective alternative to full school closures with lower social and economic costs.
Contribution
The paper introduces a data-driven simulation showing targeted class closures are nearly as effective as whole-school closures in controlling influenza outbreaks.
Findings
Targeted class closure reduces attack rate by nearly 70%.
Closing all classes of a grade is almost as effective as closing the entire school.
Targeted strategies are effective with limited information, reducing costs.
Abstract
School environments are thought to play an important role in the community spread of airborne infections (e.g., influenza) because of the high mixing rates of school children. The closure of schools has therefore been proposed as efficient mitigation strategy, with however high social and economic costs: alternative, less disruptive interventions are highly desirable. The recent availability of high-resolution contact networks in school environments provides an opportunity to design micro-interventions and compare the outcomes of alternative mitigation measures. We consider mitigation measures that involve the targeted closure of school classes or grades based on readily available information such as the number of symptomatic infectious children in a class. We focus on the case of a primary school for which we have high-resolution data on the close-range interactions of children and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
