Neural computation at the thermal limit
William B. Levy, Toby Berger, Ilya A. Fleidervish

TL;DR
This paper distinguishes between neural computation and communication costs, proposing a biophysical mechanism that allows neurons to operate near the thermal noise limit by optimizing energy use during threshold activation.
Contribution
It introduces a new perspective separating computation from communication in neurons and proposes a mechanism enabling near-thermal-limit energy efficiency at threshold.
Findings
Communication costs dominate neural energy expenditure.
Synaptic event size matches thermal noise standard deviation.
Proposed mechanism approaches the thermal noise energy limit.
Abstract
Although several measurements and analyses support the idea that the brain is energy-optimized, there is one disturbing, contradictory observation: In theory, computation limited by thermal noise can occur as cheaply as ~ joules per bit (kTln2). Unfortunately, for a neuron the ostensible discrepancy from this minimum is startling - ignoring inhibition the discrepancy is times this amount and taking inhibition into account . Here we point out that what has been defined as neural computation is actually a combination of computation and neural communication: the communication costs, transmission from each excitatory postsynaptic activation to the S4-gating-charges of the fast Na+ channels of the initial segment (fNa's), dominate the joule-costs. Making this distinction between communication to the initial segment and computation at the initial segment…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNeural dynamics and brain function · Neural Networks and Applications · Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
