Distinction of the Steinberg representation III: the tamely ramified case
Fran\c{c}ois Court\`es

TL;DR
This paper proves a conjecture by Dipendra Prasad that the Steinberg representation of a tamely ramified Galois quadratic extension of a nonarchimedean local field is distinguished by a unique character, extending previous results to the ramified case.
Contribution
It extends the proof of Prasad's conjecture to the tamely ramified case for $F$-split groups, completing the analysis for all tamely ramified extensions.
Findings
Confirmed Prasad's conjecture in the tamely ramified case
Established the uniqueness of the character $ extchi$ for distinction
Extended previous unramified case results to ramified extensions
Abstract
Let be a nonarchimedean local field, let be a Galois quadratic extension of and let be a quasisplit group defined over ; a conjecture by Dipendra Prasad states that the Steinberg representation of is then -distinguished for a given unique character of . In the first two papers of the series, Broussous and the author have proved that result when is -split and is unramified; this paper deals with the tamely ramified case, still with -split.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Algebra and Geometry · Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory · Algebraic structures and combinatorial models
