Optimisation of the design for the LOFT Large Area Detector Module
D. Walton (a), B. Winter (a), S. Zane (a), T. Kennedy (a), A.J. Coker, (a), M. Feroci (b, c), J.-W. Den Herder (d), A. Argan (e), P. Azzarello (h),, D. Barret (f, g), L. Bradley (a), F. Cadoux (h), A. Cros (f), Y. Evangelista, (b), Y. Favre (h), G. Fraser (i), M.R. Hailey (a)

TL;DR
This paper details the design optimization of the LOFT Large Area Detector Module, a key component of an X-ray observatory, emphasizing trade-offs and improvements for future proposals.
Contribution
It presents the rationale, characteristics, and optimization trade-offs of the LAD module design for the LOFT X-ray observatory.
Findings
Robust and well-documented LAD module design
Trade-offs optimized for future ESA calls
Design improvements for X-ray timing performance
Abstract
LOFT (Large Observatory for X-ray Timing) is an X-ray timing observatory that, with four other candidates, was considered by ESA as an M3 mission (with launch in 2022-2024) and has been studied during an extensive assessment phase. Its pointed instrument is the Large Area Detector (LAD), a 10 m 2 -class instrument operating in the 2-30 keV range, which is designed to perform X-ray timing of compact objects with unprecedented resolution down to millisecond time scales. Although LOFT was not downselected for launch, during the assessment most of the trade-offs have been closed, leading to a robust and well documented design that will be reproposed in future ESA calls. The building block of the LAD instrument is the Module, and in this paper we summarize the rationale for the module concept, the characteristics of the module and the trade-offs/optimisations which have led to the current…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
