Efficient solution of structural default models with correlated jumps and mutual obligations
Andrey Itkin, Alexander Lipton

TL;DR
This paper extends the structural default model to multiple banks with mutual liabilities driven by correlated Levy processes, introducing a novel stable computational method for multi-dimensional problems, and analyzes the impact of mutual liabilities on survival probabilities.
Contribution
It develops a new computational approach for multi-dimensional Levy-driven default models with mutual obligations, generalizing previous one-dimensional methods.
Findings
The method is unconditionally stable and second-order accurate.
It efficiently computes marginal and joint survival probabilities.
Numerical examples illustrate the impact of mutual liabilities.
Abstract
The structural default model of Lipton and Sepp, 2009 is generalized for a set of banks with mutual interbank liabilities whose assets are driven by correlated Levy processes with idiosyncratic and common components. The multi-dimensional problem is made tractable via a novel computational method, which generalizes the one-dimensional fractional partial differential equation method of Itkin, 2014 to the two- and three-dimensional cases. This method is unconditionally stable and of the second order of approximation in space and time; in addition, for many popular Levy models it has linear complexity in each dimension. Marginal and joint survival probabilities for two and three banks with mutual liabilities are computed. The effects of mutual liabilities are discussed, and numerical examples are given to illustrate these effects.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCredit Risk and Financial Regulations · Stochastic processes and financial applications · Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling
