The XMM-LSS survey: the Class 1 cluster sample over the extended 11 deg$^2$ and its spatial distribution

TL;DR

This study presents a high-purity sample of 52 X-ray galaxy clusters from the XMM-LSS survey, analyzing their properties, redshift distribution, and potential evolutionary effects, revealing a deficit at certain redshifts and possible explanations.

Contribution

It provides the largest, high-purity X-ray selected cluster sample with detailed measurements and investigates the redshift distribution and evolution of cluster properties.

Findings

Detected a deficit of clusters at 0.4 < z < 0.9 compared to cosmological models.

Identified a plausible negative evolution in the L_X–T_X relation normalization.

Confirmed that cluster core activity may influence observed redshift distribution.

Abstract

This paper presents 52 X-ray bright galaxy clusters selected within the 11 deg$^2$ XMM-LSS survey. 51 of them have spectroscopic redshifts ($0.05<z<1.06$), one is identified at $z_{\rm phot}=1.9$, and all together make the high-purity "Class 1" (C1) cluster sample of the XMM-LSS, the highest density sample of X-ray selected clusters with a monitored selection function. Their X-ray fluxes, averaged gas temperatures (median $T_X=2$ keV), luminosities (median $L_{X,500}=5\times10^{43}$ ergs/s) and total mass estimates (median $5\times10^{13} h^{-1} M_{\odot}$) are measured, adapting to the specific signal-to-noise regime of XMM-LSS observations. The redshift distribution of clusters shows a deficit of sources when compared to the cosmological expectations, regardless of whether WMAP-9 or Planck-2013 CMB parameters are assumed. This lack of sources is particularly noticeable at $0.4 \lesssim z \lesssim 0.9$. However, after quantifying uncertainties due to small number statistics and sample variance we are not able to put firm (i.e. $>3 \sigma$) constraints on the presence of a large void in the cluster distribution. We work out alternative hypotheses and demonstrate that a negative redshift evolution in the normalization of the $L_{X}-T_X$ relation (with respect to a self-similar evolution) is a plausible explanation for the observed deficit. We confirm this evolutionary trend by directly studying how C1 clusters populate the $L_{X}-T_X-z$ space, properly accounting for selection biases. We point out that a systematically evolving, unresolved, central component in clusters and groups (AGN contamination or cool core) can impact the classification as extended sources and be partly responsible for the observed redshift distribution.[abridged]