Generalized investigation of the rotation-activity relation: Favouring rotation period instead of Rossby number
A. Reiners, M. Schuessler, V.M. Passegger

TL;DR
This study shows that the stellar X-ray activity correlates more strongly with rotation period and radius than with the Rossby number, suggesting rotation period alone governs magnetic activity in Sun-like stars.
Contribution
It demonstrates that the rotation period alone, rather than the Rossby number, best explains the X-ray activity in low-mass stars, challenging traditional dynamo models based on Rossby number.
Findings
L_X/L_bol ~ P^{-2} R^{-4} relation fits data well
Rotation period alone determines stellar X-ray emission
Rossby number formulation less effective in explaining activity
Abstract
Magnetic activity in Sun-like and low-mass stars causes X-ray coronal emission, which is stronger for more rapidly rotating stars. This relation is often interpreted in terms of the Rossby number, i.e., the ratio of rotation period to convective overturn time. We reconsider this interpretation on the basis of the observed X-ray emission and rotation periods of 821 stars with masses below 1.4 Msun. A generalized analysis of the relation between X-ray luminosity normalized by bolometric luminosity, L_X/L_bol, and combinations of rotational period, P, and stellar radius, R, shows that the Rossby formulation does not provide the solution with minimal scatter. Instead, we find that the relation L_X/L_bol ~ P^{-2}R^{-4} optimally describes the non-saturated fraction of the stars. This relation is equivalent to L_X ~ P^{-2}, indicating that the rotation period alone determines the total X-ray…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
