Is scalar-tensor gravity consistent with polytropic stellar models?
Kaisa Henttunen, Iiro Vilja

TL;DR
This study investigates the scalar field potential in scalar-tensor gravity within polytropic stellar models, revealing that the potential varies significantly across different stellar types and cannot be universally defined.
Contribution
It numerically derives the scalar field potential for various stellar objects without assuming a specific form, highlighting the dependency on matter configuration and boundary conditions.
Findings
Potential varies with stellar type and boundary conditions
No universal scalar-tensor potential fits all stellar classes
Potential depends on matter configuration and vacuum requirements
Abstract
We study the scalar field potential in the scalar-tensor gravity with self-consistent polytropic stellar configurations. Without choosing a particular potential, we numerically derive the potential inside various stellar objects. We restrict the potential to conform to general relativity or to gravity inside and require the solution to arrive at SdS vacuum at the surface. The studied objects are required to obtain observationally valid masses and radii corresponding to solar type stars, white dwarfs and neutron stars. We find that the resulting scalar-tensor potential for the numerically derived polytrope that conforms to general relativity, in each object class, is highly dependent on the matter configuration as well as on the vacuum requirement at the boundary. As a result, every stellar configuration arrives at a potential that is not consistent…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
