Normal equivalencies for eventually periodic basic sequences
Dylan Airey, Bill Mance

TL;DR
This paper investigates when normality with respect to an eventually periodic basic sequence is equivalent to normality in a certain base, extending previous work on normality equivalences and showing boundedness alone is insufficient.
Contribution
It establishes the conditions under which $Q$-normality and $Q$-distribution normality are equivalent to base-$b$ normality for eventually periodic basic sequences.
Findings
$Q$-normality is equivalent to base-$b$ normality for certain $Q$
Boundedness of $Q$ alone does not guarantee equivalence
Equivalence depends on the specific structure of $Q$
Abstract
W. M. Schmidt, A. D. Pollington, and F. Schweiger have studied when normality with respect to one expansion is equivalent to normality with respect to another expansion. Following in their footsteps, we show that when is an eventually periodic basic sequence, that -normality and -distribution normality are equivalent to normality in base where is dependent on . We also show that boundedness of the basic sequence is not sufficient for this equivalence.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
