A Comparison between the Metric Dimension and Zero Forcing Number of Trees and Unicyclic Graphs
Linda Eroh, Cong X. Kang, Eunjeong Yi

TL;DR
This paper compares the metric dimension and zero forcing number in trees and unicyclic graphs, establishing inequalities, characterizations, and proposing a cycle rank conjecture for general graphs.
Contribution
It proves bounds relating metric dimension and zero forcing number for trees and unicyclic graphs, characterizes trees where these parameters are equal, and introduces the cycle rank conjecture.
Findings
Proves im(T) \u2264 Z(T) for trees.
Shows im(G) ss Z(G)+1 for unicyclic graphs.
Establishes bounds on im(T+e) for edges outside the tree.
Abstract
The \emph{metric dimension} of a graph is the minimum number of vertices such that every vertex of is uniquely determined by its vector of distances to the chosen vertices. The \emph{zero forcing number} of a graph is the minimum cardinality of a set of black vertices (whereas vertices in are colored white) such that is turned black after finitely many applications of "the color-change rule": a white vertex is converted black if it is the only white neighbor of a black vertex. We show that for a tree , and that if is a unicyclic graph, along the way, we characterize trees attaining . For a general graph , we introduce the "cycle rank conjecture". We conclude with a proof of for .
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
