Oxygen abundances of zCOSMOS galaxies at z~1.4 based on five lines and implications for the fundamental metallicity relation
C. Maier (University of Vienna, Department of Astrophysics, Austria),, S.J. Lilly (ETH Zurich, Switzerland), B. L. Ziegler (University of Vienna,, Department of Astrophysics, Austria), and zCOSMOS team

TL;DR
This study measures gas-phase metallicities of z~1.4 galaxies using five emission lines, finding a significant evolution in the mass-metallicity relation and supporting a non-evolving fundamental metallicity relation at high redshift.
Contribution
It provides new metallicity measurements based on five lines for galaxies at z~1.4 and investigates the evolution of the MZR and FMR at high redshift.
Findings
The MZR at z~1.4 is 3-5 times lower than the local universe.
The observed evolution aligns with a non-evolving FMR.
Using five lines yields more reliable metallicities than previous methods.
Abstract
A relation between the stellar mass M and the gas-phase metallicity Z of galaxies, the MZR, is observed up to higher redshifts. It is a matter of debate, however, if the SFR is a second parameter in the MZR. To explore this issue at z > 1, we used VLT-SINFONI near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopy of eight zCOSMOS galaxies at 1.3 < z < 1.4 to measure the strengths of four emission lines: Hbeta, [OIII]lambda5007, Halpha, and [NII]lambda6584, additional to [OII]lambda3727 measured from VIMOS. We derive reliable O/H metallicities based on five lines, and also SFRs from extinction corrected Halpha measurements. We find that the MZR of these star-forming galaxies at z~1.4 is lower than the local SDSS MZR by a factor of three to five, a larger change than reported in the literature using [NII]/Halpha-based metallicities from individual and stacked spectra. Correcting N2-based O/Hs using recent…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
