Equivalence of ADM Hamiltonian and Effective Field Theory approaches at next-to-next-to-leading order spin1-spin2 coupling of binary inspirals
Michele Levi, Jan Steinhoff

TL;DR
This paper proves the physical equivalence of the ADM Hamiltonian and Effective Field Theory approaches at next-to-next-to-leading order for spin-spin interactions in binary inspirals, ensuring consistent modeling of rapidly spinning compact objects.
Contribution
It demonstrates the complete equivalence of two different formalisms for high-order spin interactions, including gauge fixing and unphysical degree elimination, and provides gauge-invariant relations for binary dynamics.
Findings
Confirmed the equivalence of ADM and EFT approaches at NNLO with spins.
Derived curved spacetime generalizations of Newton-Wigner variables.
Provided gauge-invariant relations among energy, angular momentum, and orbital frequency.
Abstract
The next-to-next-to-leading order spin1-spin2 potential for an inspiralling binary, that is essential for accuracy to fourth post-Newtonian order, if both components in the binary are spinning rapidly, has been recently derived independently via the ADM Hamiltonian and the Effective Field Theory approaches, using different gauges and variables. Here we show the complete physical equivalence of the two results, thereby we first prove the equivalence of the ADM Hamiltonian and the Effective Field Theory approaches at next-to-next-to-leading order with the inclusion of spins. The main difficulty in the spinning sectors, which also prescribes the manner in which the comparison of the two results is tackled here, is the existence of redundant unphysical spin degrees of freedom, associated with the spin gauge choice of a point within the extended spinning object for its representative…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
