To lie or not to lie in a subspace
Daniel L. Pimentel-Alarc\'on

TL;DR
This paper provides deterministic conditions to determine when partially observed data from a union of subspaces truly lies in a single subspace and when such a subspace is unique, aiding in subspace identification.
Contribution
It introduces necessary and sufficient deterministic conditions for subspace fitting and uniqueness with incomplete data, advancing subspace analysis methods.
Findings
Conditions for data lying in a subspace are established.
Criteria for subspace uniqueness are provided.
The results enable reliable subspace identification from partial observations.
Abstract
Give deterministic necessary and sufficient conditions to guarantee that if a subspace fits certain partially observed data from a union of subspaces, it is because such data really lies in a subspace. Furthermore, Give deterministic necessary and sufficient conditions to guarantee that if a subspace fits certain partially observed data, such subspace is unique. Do this by characterizing when and only when a set of incomplete vectors behaves as a single but complete one.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques · Distributed Sensor Networks and Detection Algorithms · Control Systems and Identification
