APASS Landolt-Sloan BVgri photometry of RAVE stars. I. Data, effective temperatures and reddenings
U. Munari, A. Henden, A. Frigo, T. Zwitter, O. Bienayme, J., Bland-Hawthorn, C. Boeche, K.C. Freeman, G. Gilmore, B.K. Gibson, E.K., Grebel, A. Helmi, G. Kordopatis, S.E. Levine, J.F. Navarro, Q.A. Parker, W., Reid, G.M. Seabroke, A. Siebert, A. Siviero, T.C. Smith, M. Steinmetz

TL;DR
This paper presents high-precision photometry data for over 425,000 RAVE stars, deriving effective temperatures and reddenings through synthetic library fitting, and validates the data's accuracy and consistency with standard catalogs.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive, calibrated photometric dataset for RAVE stars, including temperature and reddening estimates, with validation against standards and literature, enhancing stellar parameter determination.
Findings
APASS photometry has high internal and external accuracy.
Reddening can be approximated by a homogeneous dust slab model.
Derived effective temperatures and reddenings are consistent with literature and standards.
Abstract
We provide APASS photometry in the Landolt BV and Sloan g'r'i' bands for all the 425,743 stars included in the latest 4th RAVE Data Release. The internal accuracy of the APASS photometry of RAVE stars, expressed as error of the mean of data obtained and separately calibrated over a median of 4 distinct observing epochs and distributed between 2009 and 2013, is 0.013, 0.012, 0.012, 0.014 and 0.021 mag for B, V, g', r' and i' band, respectively. The equally high external accuracy of APASS photometry has been verified on secondary Landolt and Sloan photometric standard stars not involved in the APASS calibration process, and on a large body of literature data on field and cluster stars, confirming the absence of offsets and trends. Compared with the Carlsberg Meridian Catalog (CMC-15), APASS astrometry of RAVE stars is accurate to a median value of 0.098 arcsec. Brightness distribution…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
