Improved constraint on the primordial gravitational-wave density using recent cosmological data and its impact on cosmic string models
Sophie Henrot-Versill\'e, Florent Robinet, Nicolas Leroy, St\'ephane, Plaszczynski, Nicolas Arnaud, Marie-Anne Bizouard, Fabien Cavalier, Nelson, Christensen, Fran\c{c}ois Couchot, Samuel Franco, Patrice Hello, Dominique, Huet, Marie Kasprzack, Olivier Perdereau, Marta Spinelli

TL;DR
This paper tightens constraints on the primordial gravitational-wave background using recent cosmological data, significantly improving previous limits and impacting models involving cosmic strings by excluding certain tension values.
Contribution
It provides the most stringent upper limit to date on the stochastic gravitational-wave background and constrains cosmic string parameters based on combined cosmological observations.
Findings
Upper limit on $oldsymbol{ ext{Omega}_{GW}h_{0}^{2}}$ improved by a factor of 2.3.
Excluded cosmic string tension values above $oldsymbol{ ext{~4 imes 10^{-9}}}$ for certain loop sizes.
Combined data sets enhance sensitivity to primordial gravitational waves.
Abstract
The production of a primordial stochastic gravitational-wave background by processes occuring in the early Universe is expected in a broad range of models. Observing this background would open a unique window onto the Universe's evolutionary history. Probes like the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) or the Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO) can be used to set upper limits on the stochastic gravitational-wave background energy density for frequencies above Hz. We perform a profile likelihood analysis of the Planck CMB temperature anisotropies and gravitational lensing data combined with WMAP low- polarization, BAO, South Pole Telescope and Atacama Cosmology Telescope data. We find that at 95\% confidence level for adiabatic initial conditions which improves over the previous limit by a factor 2.3. Assuming that…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
