Conductivity and magnetoresistance of La$_{0.7}$Ce$_{0.3}$MnO$_3$ thin films under photoexcitation
Andreas Thiessen, Elke Beyreuther, Robert Werner, Reinhold Kleiner,, Dieter Koelle, Lukas M. Eng

TL;DR
This study investigates how photoexcitation affects the electrical and magnetic properties of La$_{0.7}$Ce$_{0.3}$MnO$_3$ thin films, revealing substrate contributions and effects of oxygen deficiency, with implications for interpreting previous research.
Contribution
It uncovers the significant role of SrTiO$_3$ substrate photoconductivity and electroresistance in La$_{0.7}$Ce$_{0.3}$MnO$_3$ thin films under photoexcitation, challenging prior interpretations.
Findings
Photoconductivity involves contributions from film and substrate.
Oxygen reduction decreases film resistance.
Substrate effects influence magnetoresistance measurements.
Abstract
LaCeMnO thin films of different thicknesses, degrees of CeO-phase segregation and oxygen deficiency, grown on SrTiO single crystal substrates, were comparatively investigated with respect to both their spectral and temperature-dependent photoconductivity (PC) and their magnetoresistance (MR) behaviour under photoexcitation. While as-grown films were insensitive to optical excitation, oxygen reduction appeared to be an effective way to decrease the film resistance, but the film thickness was found to play a minor role. However, from the evaluation of the spectral behaviour of the PC and the comparison of the MR of the LCeMO/substrate-samples with a bare substrate under illumination we find that the photoconductivity data reflects not only contributions from (i) photogenerated charge carriers in the film and (ii) carriers injected from the photoconductive…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
