Simple explanation on why QKD keys have not been proved secure
Horace Yuen

TL;DR
The paper challenges the common interpretation of the trace distance criterion in quantum key distribution, providing a counter-example and discussing its implications for security proofs.
Contribution
It presents a simple counter-example that questions the prevalent interpretation of trace distance as failure probability in QKD security.
Findings
Counter-example undermines the trace distance interpretation
Implications for security proofs in QKD protocols
Highlights need for revised security criteria
Abstract
A simple counter-example is given on the prevalent interpretation of the trace distance criterion as failure probability in quantum key distribution protocols. A summary of its ramifications is listed.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Information and Cryptography · Quantum Mechanics and Applications
