Undecidability of Finite Model Reasoning in DLFD
David Toman, Grant Weddell

TL;DR
This paper addresses the unresolved question of whether finite model reasoning for path functional dependencies is decidable, contributing to the theoretical understanding of database dependencies.
Contribution
It proves the undecidability of finite model reasoning in the context of path functional dependencies, resolving an open problem.
Findings
Finite model reasoning for PFDs is undecidable.
The result impacts database theory and dependency reasoning.
Provides a theoretical foundation for future research.
Abstract
We resolve an open problem concerning finite logical implication for path functional dependencies (PFDs).
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSemantic Web and Ontologies · Advanced Database Systems and Queries · Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
