Quantum annealing correction for random Ising problems
Kristen L. Pudenz, Tameem Albash, Daniel A. Lidar

TL;DR
This paper shows that quantum annealing correction significantly improves the performance of a quantum annealer on hard random Ising problems, addressing errors and device limitations.
Contribution
The study introduces a tailored quantum annealing correction method for the D-Wave Two device, demonstrating performance improvements over classical repetition codes and robustness to device imperfections.
Findings
QAC improves performance with problem size and hardness
QAC overcomes device precision limits and calibration errors
Performance remains robust despite missing qubits
Abstract
We demonstrate that the performance of a quantum annealer on hard random Ising optimization problems can be substantially improved using quantum annealing correction (QAC). Our error correction strategy is tailored to the D-Wave Two device. We find that QAC provides a statistically significant enhancement in the performance of the device over a classical repetition code, improving as a function of problem size as well as hardness. Moreover, QAC provides a mechanism for overcoming the precision limit of the device, in addition to correcting calibration errors. Performance is robust even to missing qubits. We present evidence for a constructive role played by quantum effects in our experiments by contrasting the experimental results with the predictions of a classical model of the device. Our work demonstrates the importance of error correction in appropriately determining the performance…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
