Mass-angular-momentum relations implied by models of twin peak quasi-periodic oscillations
Gabriel Torok, Pavel Bakala, Eva Sramkova, Zdenek Stuchlik, Martin, Urbanec, Katerina Goluchova

TL;DR
This paper investigates how different twin peak QPO models imply specific mass-angular-momentum relations for neutron stars, analyzing observational data from two sources to understand model constraints and variability.
Contribution
It extends previous work by comparing multiple QPO models across different sources, revealing a dichotomy in model predictive power related to source frequency.
Findings
High-frequency sources provide stronger model constraints.
Low-frequency sources show weaker restrictions on neutron star parameters.
Variability in model predictions is linked to orbital frequency dependence.
Abstract
Twin peak quasi-periodic oscillations (QPOs) appear in the X-ray power-density spectra of several accreting low-mass neutron star (NS) binaries. Observations of the peculiar Z-source Circinus X-1 display unusually low QPO frequencies. Using these observations, we have previously considered the relativistic precession (RP) twin peak QPO model to estimate the mass of central NS in Circinus X-1. We have shown that such an estimate results in a specific mass-angular-momentum (M-j) relation rather than a single preferred combination of M and j. Here we confront our previous results with another binary, the atoll source 4U 1636-53 that displays the twin peak QPOs at very high frequencies, and extend the consideration to various twin peak QPO models. In analogy to the RP model, we find that these imply their own specific M-j relations. We explore these relations for both sources and note…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
