The Hidden Cost of Accommodating Crowdfunder Privacy Preferences: A Randomized Field Experiment
Gordon Burtch, Anindya Ghose, Sunil Wattal

TL;DR
This study investigates how privacy controls on crowdfunding platforms influence contributor behavior, revealing that reducing privacy options can increase overall fundraising but decrease individual contribution amounts due to privacy priming effects.
Contribution
It provides experimental evidence on the causal effects of privacy mechanisms in crowdfunding, highlighting the trade-offs between engagement and contribution size.
Findings
Reducing privacy controls increases contribution probability by 4.9%.
Privacy reduction causes an average contribution decline of $5.81.
Privacy priming influences contributors to temper extreme donations.
Abstract
Online crowdfunding has received a great deal of attention from entrepreneurs and policymakers as a promising avenue to fostering entrepreneurship and innovation. A notable aspect of this shift from an offline to an online setting is that it brings increased visibility and traceability of transactions. Many crowdfunding platforms therefore provide mechanisms that enable a campaign contributor to conceal his or her identity or contribution amount from peers. We study the impact of these information (privacy) control mechanisms on crowdfunder behavior. Employing a randomized experiment at one of the largest online crowdfunding platforms, we find evidence of both positive (e.g., comfort) and negative (e.g., privacy priming) causal effects. We find that reducing access to information controls induces a net increase in fundraising, yet this outcome results from two competing influences:…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
