Synthetic versus Dirac monopoles
Carl M. Bender, Maarten DeKieviet, and K. A. Milton

TL;DR
This paper discusses the differences and similarities between synthetic magnetic monopoles and Dirac monopoles, highlighting potential misconceptions in recent experimental claims and clarifying the conceptual distinctions.
Contribution
It critically examines recent experimental work, clarifies the theoretical differences, and addresses misconceptions about Dirac monopoles versus synthetic monopoles.
Findings
Recent experiments blur the distinction between synthetic and Dirac monopoles.
Claims about Dirac monopoles in some experiments may be misleading.
The paper emphasizes the importance of clear conceptual understanding.
Abstract
In some recent experiments the distinction between synthetic magnetic monopoles and Dirac monopoles has been blurred. A case in point is the work in a letter by Ray {\it et al.} [arXiv:1408.3133] in which a beautiful experiment is reported but claims with regard to Dirac monopoles are misleading.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates · Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research · Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics
