Classical Interaction of a Magnet and a Point Charge: The Shockley-James Paradox
Timothy H. Boyer

TL;DR
This paper critiques a common misunderstanding of the Shockley-James paradox, emphasizing the importance of internal electromagnetic momentum in a classical magnet-charge system and correcting previous misconceptions.
Contribution
It clarifies the role of internal electromagnetic momentum in the classical interaction between a magnet and a point charge, challenging prior reliance on hidden mechanical momentum.
Findings
Internal electromagnetic momentum opposes external electromagnetic momentum.
Detailed calculation for a two-charge magnet model confirms the internal momentum.
Critique of Coleman and Van Vleck's interpretation of the paradox.
Abstract
It is pointed out that Coleman and Van Vleck make a major blunder in their discussion of the Shockly-James paradox by designating relativistic hidden mechanical momentum as the basis for resolution of the paradox. This blunder has had a wide influence in the current physics literature, including erroneous work on the Shockley-James paradox, on Mansuripur's paradox, on the motion of a magnetic moment, on the Aharonov-Bohm phase shift, and on the Aharonov-Casher phase shift. Although hidden mechanical momentum is indeed dominant for non-interacting particles moving in a closed orbit under the influence of an external electric field, the attention directed toward hidden mechanical momentum represents a fundamental misunderstanding of the classical electromagnetic interaction between a multiparticle magnet and an external point charge. In the interacting multiparticle situation, the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
