A Gaia successor with NIR Sensors
Erik H{\o}g, Jens Knude (Niels Bohr Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark)

TL;DR
This paper evaluates the feasibility of a Gaia successor mission with NIR sensors, concluding that NIR does not significantly improve astrometry except for very red, obscured stars, due to wavelength limitations.
Contribution
It provides a detailed technical assessment of NIR sensor options for a Gaia-like mission and concludes that NIR sensors offer limited benefits for astrometry.
Findings
NIR sensors at two microns degrade astrometric accuracy.
Heavily obscured, red stars benefit slightly from NIR sensors.
Design with CMOS sensors was abandoned for technical reasons.
Abstract
The expected accurate astrometric data from Gaia offer the opportunity and the obligation to exploitation by a second all-sky mission. Therefore a proposal was submitted to ESA in May 2013 for a Gaia-like mission in about twenty years. Two new designs are here considered with NIR sensors in addition to the visual CCDs as in Gaia. This has been suggested by several colleagues in order to get better astrometry in obscured regions. A first design with CMOS sensors was quickly abandoned for technical reasons. The second design with specially developed CCDs for NIR looked more promising. But a deeper study showed that the longer wavelength in the near infrared at two microns deteriorates astrometry so much that only heavily obscured stars of extremely red types as M5III would obtain a better accuracy. Thus, an option with NIR sensors does not seem promissing.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStellar, planetary, and galactic studies · Astronomy and Astrophysical Research · Astro and Planetary Science
