The Strength of Some Combinatorial Principles Related to Ramsey's Theorem for Pairs
Denis R. Hirschfeldt, Carl G. Jockusch, Bj{\o}rn Kjos-Hanssen, Steffen, Lempp, and Theodore A. Slaman

TL;DR
This paper investigates the logical strength of certain combinatorial principles related to Ramsey's Theorem for pairs, revealing implications and limitations within reverse mathematics and computability theory.
Contribution
It establishes new implications between principles like SRT$^2_2$, DNR, and COH, and answers an open question about stable colorings and homogeneous sets.
Findings
SRT$^2_2$ implies DNR over RCA$_0$
COH does not imply DNR over RCA$_0$
Every computable stable 2-coloring of pairs has an incomplete $ ext{Delta}^0_2$ infinite homogeneous set
Abstract
We study the reverse mathematics and computability-the\-o\-re\-tic strength of (stable) Ramsey's Theorem for pairs and the related principles COH and DNR. We show that SRT implies DNR over RCA but COH does not, and answer a question of Mileti by showing that every computable stable -coloring of pairs has an incomplete infinite homogeneous set. We also give some extensions of the latter result, and relate it to potential approaches to showing that SRT does not imply RT.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
