Can many-valued logic help to comprehend quantum phenomena?
Jaros{\l}aw Pykacz

TL;DR
This paper proposes that many-valued logic, specifically { extL}ukasiewicz logic, can better explain quantum phenomena and resolve paradoxes by modeling properties of quantum objects before measurement.
Contribution
It introduces a model of infinitely-valued { extL}ukasiewicz logic to describe quantum properties, challenging the traditional two-valued logic approach.
Findings
Reinterprets the GHZ paradox as an artifact of two-valued logic
Demonstrates the use of many-valued logic in quantum property description
Suggests a new logical framework for quantum phenomena
Abstract
Following {\L}ukasiewicz, we argue that future non-certain events should be described with the use of many-valued, not 2-valued logic. The Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger `paradox' is shown to be an artifact caused by unjustified use of 2-valued logic while considering results of future non-certain events. Description of properties of quantum objects before they are measured should be performed with the use of propositional functions that form a particular model of infinitely-valued {\L}ukasiewicz logic. This model is distinguished by specific operations of negation, conjunction, and disjunction that are used in it.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
