On the integral Tate conjecture for finite fields
Masaki Kameko

TL;DR
This paper provides counterexamples to the integral Tate conjecture over finite fields, extending previous results to all prime numbers and challenging existing assumptions in algebraic geometry.
Contribution
It introduces non-torsion counterexamples for the integral Tate conjecture applicable to all prime numbers over finite fields.
Findings
Counterexamples to the integral Tate conjecture for all primes
Extension of prior results from specific primes to all primes
Challenges to the validity of the integral Tate conjecture in this setting
Abstract
We give non-torsion counterexamples against the integral Tate conjecture for finite fields. We extend the result due to Pirutka and Yagita for prime numbers 2,3,5 to all prime numbers.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
