CoRoT-22 b: a validated 4.9 RE exoplanet in 10-day orbit
C. Moutou, J-M. Almenara, R.F. Diaz, R. Alonso, M. Deleuil, E., Guenther, T. Pasternacki, S. Aigrain, A. Baglin, P. Barge, A. Bonomo, P., Borde, F. Bouchy, J. Cabrera, S. Carpano, W. Cochran, Sz. Csizmadia, H. Deeg,, R. Dvorak, M. Endl, A. Erikson, S. Ferraz-Mello, D. Gandolfi

TL;DR
This paper validates CoRoT-22 b as a transiting exoplanet with a radius of about 4.9 Earth radii and a 10-day orbit, using Bayesian analysis and multiple observational constraints, despite the lack of direct radial velocity confirmation.
Contribution
It introduces a comprehensive Bayesian validation method for exoplanets where ground-based follow-up is limited, demonstrating its effectiveness with CoRoT-22 b.
Findings
The planet has a radius of approximately 4.9 Earth radii.
The orbital period is about 9.76 days.
The planet's mass is constrained to be less than 49 Earth masses.
Abstract
The CoRoT satellite has provided high-precision photometric light curves for more than 163,000 stars and found several hundreds of transiting systems compatible with a planetary scenario. If ground-based velocimetric observations are the best way to identify the actual planets among many possible configurations of eclipsing binary systems, recent transit surveys have shown that it is not always within reach of the radial-velocity detection limits. In this paper, we present a transiting exoplanet candidate discovered by CoRoT whose nature cannot be established from ground-based observations, and where extensive analyses are used to validate the planet scenario. They are based on observing constraints from radial-velocity spectroscopy, adaptive optics imaging and the CoRoT transit shape, as well as from priors on stellar populations, planet and multiple stellar systems frequency. We use…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
