Quenching of Star Formation in SDSS Groups: Centrals, Satellites, and Galactic Conformity

TL;DR

This study re-examines galaxy quenching in SDSS groups, revealing that centrals respond to environment similarly to satellites, and emphasizing the role of central sSFR in galactic conformity and quenching processes.

Contribution

It demonstrates that group quenching applies to centrals and satellites alike and explores the influence of various environmental and galaxy properties on quenching efficiency.

Findings

Centrals in groups respond to environment like satellites.

Galactic conformity is strong and varies across parameters.

Environmental and mass quenching may be manifestations of the same process.

Abstract

We re-examine the fraction of low-redshift Sloan Digital Sky Survey satellites and centrals in which star formation has been quenched, using the environment quenching efficiency formalism that separates out the dependence of stellar mass. We show that the centrals of the groups containing the satellites are responding to the environment in the same way as their satellites (at least for stellar masses above 10^10.3 Msun), and that the well-known differences between satellites and the general set of centrals arise because the latter are overwhelmingly dominated by isolated galaxies. The widespread concept of "satellite quenching" as the cause of environmental effects in the galaxy population can therefore be generalized to "group quenching". We then explore the dependence of the quenching efficiency of satellites on overdensity, group-centric distance, halo mass, the stellar mass of the satellite, and the stellar mass and specific star formation rate (sSFR) of its central, trying to isolate the effect of these often interdependent variables. We emphasize the importance of the central sSFR in the quenching efficiency of the associated satellites, and develop the meaning of this "galactic conformity" effect in a probabilistic description of the quenching of galaxies. We show that conformity is strong, and that it varies strongly across parameter space. Several arguments then suggest that environmental quenching and mass quenching may be different manifestations of the same underlying process. The marked difference in the apparent mass dependencies of environment quenching and mass quenching which produces distinctive signatures in the mass functions of centrals and satellites will arise naturally, since, for satellites at least, the distributions of the environmental variables that we investigate in this work are essentially independent of the stellar mass of the satellite.