Self-embeddings of computable trees
Stephen Binns, Bj{\o}rn Kjos-Hanssen, Manuel Lerman, James H. Schmerl,, and Reed Solomon

TL;DR
This paper classifies infinite computable trees into three types based on the complexity of their nontrivial self-embeddings, establishing optimal results and exploring their complexity and connections to reverse mathematics.
Contribution
It provides a classification of computable trees by the complexity of their self-embeddings and establishes optimal bounds for these complexities.
Findings
For the first two types, 0' computes a nontrivial self-embedding.
For the third type, 0'' computes a nontrivial self-embedding.
Every infinite computable tree has either an infinite computable chain or an infinite Pi^0_1 antichain.
Abstract
We divide the class of infinite computable trees into three types. For the first and second types, computes a nontrivial self-embedding while for the third type computes a nontrivial self-embedding. These results are optimal and we obtain partial results concerning the complexity of nontrivial self-embeddings of infinite computable trees considered up to isomorphism. We show that every infinite computable tree must have either an infinite computable chain or an infinite antichain. This result is optimal and has connections to the program of reverse mathematics.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComputability, Logic, AI Algorithms · Advanced Topology and Set Theory
