It'll probably work out: improved list-decoding through random operations

TL;DR

This paper introduces a framework analyzing how random operations like folding and puncturing can enhance the list-decodability of codes, providing new theoretical insights and practical code constructions with improved error correction capabilities.

Contribution

It develops a general framework for understanding how random code transformations improve list-decodability, leading to new code existence results and insights into code structure.

Findings

Existence of binary codes list-decodable from half errors with optimal rate

Random folding of codes with constant relative distance achieves near-capacity list decoding

Codes with suboptimal list sizes contain subcodes with near-optimal list sizes

Abstract

In this work, we introduce a framework to study the effect of random operations on the combinatorial list-decodability of a code. The operations we consider correspond to row and column operations on the matrix obtained from the code by stacking the codewords together as columns. This captures many natural transformations on codes, such as puncturing, folding, and taking subcodes; we show that many such operations can improve the list-decoding properties of a code. There are two main points to this. First, our goal is to advance our (combinatorial) understanding of list-decodability, by understanding what structure (or lack thereof) is necessary to obtain it. Second, we use our more general results to obtain a few interesting corollaries for list decoding: (1) We show the existence of binary codes that are combinatorially list-decodable from $1/2-\epsilon$ fraction of errors with optimal rate $\Omega(\epsilon^2)$ that can be encoded in linear time. (2) We show that any code with $\Omega(1)$ relative distance, when randomly folded, is combinatorially list-decodable $1-\epsilon$ fraction of errors with high probability. This formalizes the intuition for why the folding operation has been successful in obtaining codes with optimal list decoding parameters; previously, all arguments used algebraic methods and worked only with specific codes. (3) We show that any code which is list-decodable with suboptimal list sizes has many subcodes which have near-optimal list sizes, while retaining the error correcting capabilities of the original code. This generalizes recent results where subspace evasive sets have been used to reduce list sizes of codes that achieve list decoding capacity.