Extending two-Higgs-doublet models by a singlet scalar field - the Case for Dark Matter
Aleksandra Drozd, Bohdan Grzadkowski, John F. Gunion, Yun Jiang

TL;DR
This paper investigates extended two-Higgs-doublet models with a singlet scalar as a dark matter candidate, analyzing their compatibility with collider, direct detection, and cosmological constraints, and exploring their potential to explain experimental signals.
Contribution
It introduces a 2HDM extension with a singlet scalar dark matter candidate, thoroughly analyzing theoretical and experimental constraints, and assessing its viability for explaining dark matter signals.
Findings
Models are consistent with LHC, LEP, B physics, and Higgs data.
Dark matter masses above 55 GeV fit cosmological and direct detection limits.
Some low-mass points (6-25 GeV) align with positive direct detection signals, but are mostly excluded by LUX and SuperCDMS.
Abstract
We extend the two-Higgs doublet models of Type I and Type II by adding a real gauge-singlet scalar S dark matter candidate (2HDMS models). We impose theoretical constraints deriving from perturbativity, stability, unitarity and correct electroweak symmetry breaking and require that the lightest CP-even Higgs, h, fit the LHC data for the GeV state at the ~C.L. after including existing constraints from LEP and B physics and LHC limits on the heavier Higgs bosons. We find that these models are easily consistent with the LUX and SuperCDMS limits on dark-matter-Nucleon scattering and the observed for S masses above about 55 GeV. At lower , the situation is more delicate. For points with in the 6-25 GeV range corresponding to the CDMS~II and CRESST-II positive signal ranges, the dark-matter-Nucleon cross sections predicted by the Type I and Type II…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
