
TL;DR
Differential game logic (dGL) provides a formal framework for specifying and verifying properties of hybrid games with adversarial dynamics, enabling analysis of winning strategies and demonstrating greater expressiveness than hybrid system logics.
Contribution
The paper introduces dGL, a sound and complete logic for hybrid games, and characterizes its expressiveness as strictly greater than hybrid systems logic.
Findings
dGL can determine winning strategies in hybrid games.
Hybrid games are determined but may require transfinitely many steps to compute winning regions.
dGL is more expressive than hybrid systems logic.
Abstract
Differential game logic (dGL) is a logic for specifying and verifying properties of hybrid games, i.e. games that combine discrete, continuous, and adversarial dynamics. Unlike hybrid systems, hybrid games allow choices in the system dynamics to be resolved adversarially by different players with different objectives. The logic dGL can be used to study the existence of winning strategies for such hybrid games, i.e. ways of resolving the player's choices in some way so that he wins by achieving his objective for all choices of the opponent. Hybrid games are determined, i.e. from each state, one player has a winning strategy, yet computing their winning regions may take transfinitely many steps. The logic dGL, nevertheless, has a sound and complete axiomatization relative to any expressive logic. Separating axioms are identified that distinguish hybrid games from hybrid systems. Finally,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
