Does it Make Sense to Speak of Self-Locating Uncertainty in the Universal Wave Function? Remarks on Sebens and Carroll
Adrian Kent (Centre for Quantum Information, Foundations, DAMTP,, University of Cambridge, Perimeter Institute)

TL;DR
This paper critically examines the claim that self-locating uncertainty in the universal wave function resolves probability issues in Everettian quantum theory, highlighting some problems with Sebens and Carroll's arguments.
Contribution
It provides a critical analysis of Sebens and Carroll's proposal, identifying issues with their interpretation of self-locating uncertainty in Everettian quantum mechanics.
Findings
Identifies problems with the notion of self-locating uncertainty in Everettian theory
Challenges the idea that uncertainty solves probability interpretation issues
Offers insights into the conceptual foundations of quantum mechanics
Abstract
Following a proposal of Vaidman, Sebens and Carroll have argued that in Everettian (i.e. purely unitary) quantum theory, observers are uncertain, before they complete their observation, about which Everettian branch they are on. They argue further that this solves the problem of making sense of probabilities within Everettian quantum theory, even though the theory itself is deterministic. We note some problems with these arguments.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
