TL;DR
This paper is a reply to Werner's critique of the author's previous work on Bell's theorem, addressing disagreements and clarifying the original conclusions.
Contribution
The paper provides a detailed rebuttal to Werner's comments, defending the original analysis of Bell's theorem.
Findings
Clarifies misunderstandings about Bell's theorem
Reaffirms the original paper's conclusions
Addresses specific points raised by Werner
Abstract
Reinhard Werner authored a comment on my paper "What Bell Did", disputing the conclusion and argumentation of the paper. This is my reply.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.