Comment on: Maximal violation of Bell inequalities by position measurements
Detlef D\"urr, Sheldon Goldstein, Tim Maudlin, Robin Schlenga, Daniel, V. Tausk, Roderich Tumulka, Nino Zangh\`i

TL;DR
This paper critiques a 2010 claim that Bohmian Mechanics differs empirically from Quantum Mechanics, clarifying that the original claim is incorrect and reaffirming the empirical equivalence.
Contribution
It provides a critical analysis of the 2010 claim, correcting misconceptions about Bohmian Mechanics' empirical predictions.
Findings
The 2010 claim is incorrect.
Bohmian Mechanics aligns with Quantum Mechanics empirically.
Clarifies misunderstandings about measurement predictions.
Abstract
In an article published in 2010, Kiukas and Werner claim to have shown that Bohmian Mechanics does not make the same empirical predictions as ordinary Quantum Mechanics. We explain that such claim is wrong.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Mechanics and Applications · Philosophy and History of Science · Quantum Information and Cryptography
