A Logic for Reasoning about Upper Probabilities
Joseph Y. Halpern, Riccardo Pucella

TL;DR
This paper introduces a propositional logic framework for reasoning about uncertainty using sets of probability measures, providing a complete axiomatization and analyzing computational complexity.
Contribution
It presents a novel logic for upper probabilities with a sound, complete axiomatization and establishes NP-completeness of the satisfiability problem.
Findings
Logic effectively models uncertainty with probability intervals
Axiomatization is sound and complete
Satisfiability is NP-complete, matching propositional logic complexity
Abstract
We present a propositional logic to reason about the uncertainty of events, where the uncertainty is modeled by a set of probability measures assigning an interval of probability to each event. We give a sound and complete axiomatization for the logic, and show that the satisfiability problem is NP-complete, no harder than satisfiability for propositional logic.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
