Comment on "A test-tube model for rainfall" by Wilkinson M., EPL 106 (2014) 40001
Martin Rohloff, Tobias Lapp, and J\"urgen Vollmer
TL;DR
This paper critiques Wilkinson's test-tube model for rainfall, highlighting discrepancies between Wilkinson's conclusions and the authors' observational data.
Contribution
It provides a critical analysis pointing out inconsistencies in Wilkinson's interpretation of experimental data on rainfall modeling.
Findings
Wilkinson's conclusions are at variance with the authors' observations
The authors clarify their data and challenge the validity of Wilkinson's model
Highlights the importance of accurate data interpretation in rainfall modeling
Abstract
This paper is a comment to M Wilkinson, EPL 106 (2014) 40001, arXiv:1401.4620 [physics.ao-ph,cond-mat.soft], which draws conclusion from our data that are at variance with our observations.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.