Comment on "Exact fluctuation theorem without ensemble quantities"
Jae Sung Lee, Sourabh Lahiri, Chulan Kwon

TL;DR
This paper critically examines a recent claim about expressing total entropy production in measurable terms, clarifies the correct conditions for fluctuation theorems, and proposes a proper setup for their validity.
Contribution
The authors identify issues with previous work's backward protocol and provide a corrected setup and theoretical framework for fluctuation theorems under specific initial conditions.
Findings
The backward protocol must be a true time-reversal of the forward protocol.
The ratio of path probabilities does not always represent total entropy production.
Proper initial conditions are crucial for fluctuation theorem validity.
Abstract
In a recent work by Cuetara et al. (Phys. Rev. E 89, 052119 (2014)), the authors claimed that if a system is prepared under suitable initial conditions, then the total entropy production (EP) for the system and reservoirs can be expressed in terms of physically measurable quantities. However, the backward protocol used in their work is not time-reversed of the forward protocol so that the quantity obtained from the ratio of the forward and backward path probabilities is neither the total EP nor any measurable quantity. We propose a suitable setup which satisfies their pursuit. We also provide a theoretical background as to what quantity satisfies the fluctuation theorem depending on the intial conditions chosen for the forward and backward processes.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics · Quantum Mechanics and Applications · stochastic dynamics and bifurcation
