Labeled and Non-labeled Extended Rauzy Classes
Jon Fickenscher

TL;DR
This paper explores the relationship between labeled and non-labeled conventions in Interval Exchange Transformations by analyzing Extended Rauzy Classes, clarifying their connections for better understanding of IETs and Flat Surfaces.
Contribution
It establishes the relationship between Extended Rauzy Classes under labeled and non-labeled conventions, bridging a gap in the combinatorial understanding of IETs.
Findings
Unified understanding of Rauzy Classes across conventions
Clarified the combinatorial structure of IETs
Facilitated research on Flat Surfaces using different conventions
Abstract
Multiple conventions have been adopted for denoting Interval Exchange Transformations (IETs). The "non-labeled" convention was the original, while the "labeled" convention has proven convenient when investigating Flat Surfaces as described by IETs. We establish the relationship between Extended Rauzy Classes, an equivalence class of combinatorial data related to IETs, under each convention.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMathematical Dynamics and Fractals · semigroups and automata theory · Advanced Topology and Set Theory
