Mapping accretion and its variability in the young open cluster NGC 2264: a study based on u-band photometry
Laura Venuti, J\'er\^ome Bouvier, Ettore Flaccomio, Silvia H. P., Alencar, Jonathan Irwin, John R. Stauffer, Ann Marie Cody, Paula S. Teixeira,, Alana P. Sousa, Giuseppina Micela, Jean-Charles Cuillandre, Giovanni Peres

TL;DR
This study characterizes accretion in young stars of NGC 2264 using UV excess measurements from deep photometry, revealing a strong correlation between stellar mass and accretion rate, with significant variability and potential age effects.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed UV-based accretion analysis for hundreds of young stars in NGC 2264, establishing a mass-accretion rate relation and exploring variability and underlying mechanisms.
Findings
Mass accretion rates range from 1e-10 to 1e-7 solar masses per year.
A strong correlation exists between stellar mass and accretion rate, M_acc ∝ M^{1.4±0.3}.
Accretion rate variability over weeks is about 0.5 dex, smaller than the overall spread.
Abstract
We aim at characterizing the accretion properties of several hundred members of the star-forming cluster NGC 2264 (3 Myr). We performed a deep u,g,r,i mapping and a simultaneous u+r monitoring of the region with CFHT/MegaCam in order to directly probe the accretion process from UV excess measurements. Photometric properties and stellar parameters are determined homogeneously for about 750 monitored young objects, spanning the mass range 0.1-2 Mo. About 40% are classical (accreting) T Tauri stars, based on various diagnostics (H_alpha, UV and IR excesses). The remaining non-accreting members define the (photospheric+chromospheric) reference UV emission level over which flux excess is detected and measured. We revise the membership status of cluster members based on UV accretion signatures and report a new population of 50 CTTS candidates. A large range of UV excess is measured for the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
