Study of hadron interactions in a lead-emulsion target
Hirokazu Ishida, Tsutomu Fukuda, Takafumi Kajiwara, Koichi Kodama,, Masahiro Komatsu, Tomokazu Matsuo, Shoji Mikado, Mitsuhiro Nakamura, Satoru, Ogawa, Andrey Sheshukov, Hiroshi Shibuya, Jun Sudou, Taira Suzuki, Yusuke, Tsuchida

TL;DR
This study investigates hadron interactions in a lead-emulsion target using high-energy beams, measuring interaction characteristics and validating simulation models relevant for neutrino oscillation experiments.
Contribution
It provides detailed experimental data on hadron interactions and nuclear fragment emissions, validating Monte Carlo simulations for background estimation in neutrino experiments.
Findings
Interaction lengths and secondary particle distributions match simulations.
Nuclear fragment emission probabilities are >50% for P > 4 GeV/c.
Results support background estimation in tau neutrino detection.
Abstract
Topological and kinematical characteristics of hadron interactions have been studied using a lead-emulsion target exposed to 2, 4 and 10 GeV/c hadron beams. A total length of 60 m tracks was followed using a high speed automated emulsion scanning system. A total of 318 hadron interaction vertices and their secondary charged particle tracks were reconstructed. Measurement results of interaction lengths, charged particle multiplicity, emission angles and momenta of secondary charged particles are compared with a Monte Carlo simulation and appear to be consistent. Nuclear fragments emitted from interaction vertices were also detected by a newly developed emulsion scanning system with wide-angle acceptance. Their emission angle distributions are in good agreement with the simulated distributions. Probabilities of an event being associated with at least one fragment track are found…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
